|
| |
| Family Tree Primer |
|
| Rather than go through
the details of the Linnaeus classification system of animals, here
we will use common animal names and a overly simplified reference to
demonstrate relation in perhaps a overly generalized fashion: Let's
follow the Wolf down the family tree, in particular; the North
American "Timber Wolf" for this example. the table illustrates its
relationship to: Kangaroo, Mankind, Pig, Cat, Bear, Fox, Dog, and
other types of wolf. |
|
Animals in the same
Class |
Animals in the same
Sub-class |
Animals in the same
Super-Order |
Animals in the same
Order |
Animals in the same
Sub-order |
Animals in the same
Family |
Animals belonging to the same
Genus |
Animals of the same
Species |
Animals of the same
Sub-species |
|
Timber Wolf |
Timber Wolf |
Timber Wolf |
Timber Wolf |
Timber Wolf |
Timber Wolf |
Timber Wolf |
Timber Wolf |
Timber Wolf |
|
Artic wolf |
Artic wolf |
Artic wolf |
Artic wolf |
Artic wolf |
Artic wolf |
Artic wolf |
Artic wolf |
|
|
Dog |
Dog |
Dog |
Dog |
Dog |
Dog |
Dog |
|
|
|
|
Fox |
Fox |
Fox |
Fox |
Fox |
Fox |
|
|
|
|
|
Bear |
Bear |
Bear |
Bear |
Bear |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cat |
Cat |
Cat |
Cat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pig |
Pig |
Pig |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Man |
Man |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kangaroo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As we go "down the stairs", in a general sense,
the animals "common ancestor" goes farther in the past, and shared
characteristics subtract. The first split here is from "Class" to
Sub-Class, and differentiates placental mammals from marsupials,
that "split" occurred approximately before or around when the
dinosaurs became extinct. The next split: "super order" occurred
early in the age of mammals (exactly when is outside the scope and
objective here) point being: it was a VERY long time ago. There
really isn't any bottom line time scale or formula for divergence at any branch of the
tree. In this example, each split occurs in millions of years,
and in this case: bear and dog families diverged only a few million
years ago, had we used rhinos and horses, that family split might
have been tens of millions of years farther back, with one rhino
genera surviving intact since then. Again this is a generalization
and over simplification of the evolutionary process. The point here
is to give you a sense of scale and relation based on common
ancestry and characteristics, and demonstrate that the Linnaeus
system is based on characteristics that extend beyond appearance. .
|
| Applying this same example to a
common killifish: Fundulopanchax gardneri "Akure": In the below
example the principle is the same, except the time scale is probably
a little different with fish; fish as a whole are a older lot, so
some splits may have occurred further in the past (again exact times
are outside the scope here), and
moreover a this species reproductive cycle might be faster in
comparison (the time between
generations), so differentiation may occur faster or slower, it all depends on environmental variables and pressures,
reproductive rates and so on.
Some species of mammals and fish, like the puma and carp can range
over a wide area and variety of habitats and show very little
variation throughout their range (they represent a adaptable or
generic design
with very little impetus to specialize/diverge). Other species like the
wolf (in the first example) can have 2-3 subspecies in the same
state, and similiarly: many killifish of the same species can vary greatly in
appearance (or breeding difficulty) from one body of water
(population/location) to
another. This is why killifish enthusiast place so much emphasis on
maintaining a chain of "custody" for the original collection
location, and going through great lengths to maintain the purity of
the assorted strains even within the same
sub-species |
|
Animals in the same
Class |
Animals in the same
Sub-class |
Animals in the same
Super-Order |
Animals in the same
Order |
Animals in the same
Family |
Animals belonging to the same
Genus |
Animals of the same
Species |
Animals of the same
Sub-species |
Location |
|
GAR "Akure" |
GAR "Akure" |
GAR "Akure" |
GAR "Akure" |
GAR "Akure" |
GAR "Akure" |
GAR "Akure" |
Clauseni |
Akure |
|
GAR "N'Sukka" |
GAR "N'Sukka" |
GAR "N'Sukka" |
GAR "N'Sukka" |
GAR "N'Sukka" |
GAR "N'Sukka" |
GAR "N'Sukka" |
|
|
|
Blue Gularis |
Blue Gularis |
Blue Gularis |
Blue Gularis |
Blue Gularis |
Blue Gularis |
|
|
|
|
Pearlfish |
Pearlfish |
Pearlfish |
Pearlfish |
Pearlfish |
|
|
|
|
|
Guppy |
Guppy |
Guppy |
Guppy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tetra |
Tetra |
Tetra |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perch |
Perch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So while all this jargon and information may seem irrelevant at
first to
the new or part-time hobbyist, it provides some background and/or relevance the first
time you attempt to apply the same husbandry or breeding procedures
to two seemingly identical/similar killifish (the different strains
of Aphyosemion elberti, Austrolebias nigripinnis, and even some of
the Fundulopanchax gardneri strains come to mind). It may not be
important for one to fully understand the "evolutionary process",
but you should have a idea of scale when conversation turn from
genera, to species to locations, or when you get a newly collected
killifish and would like to know how it fits into the bigger scheme
of things |
| |
|